WC3 TrackerMapsFootmen Vs Grunts vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Footmen Vs Grunts vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,480 recorded sessions versus 1,246. Footmen Vs Grunts averages more players per lobby (5.5 vs 4.6), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 3.9 min on average versus 12.6 min for Footmen Vs Grunts. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Footmen Vs Grunts Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricFootmen Vs GruntsWarofraces
Total sessions1,2467,480
Unique hosts64258
Avg players/lobby5.5 4.6
Avg lobby open time12.6 min3.9 min
Sessions (30d)2971,662
Tracked versions4435
Last hostedJul 5, 2026Jul 5, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
196
1,531
Jun 26
673
4,233
Jul 26
189
1,158

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Footmen Vs Grunts and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,480 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 1,246 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Footmen Vs Grunts has more players per lobby on average (5.5) than Warofraces (4.6).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 3.9 min on average versus 12.6 min for Footmen Vs Grunts. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,662 vs 297). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Footmen Vs Grunts has been hosted by 64 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.