WC3 TrackerMapsGridlock vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Gridlock vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,637 recorded sessions versus 11. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 2.5), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 4.3 min for Gridlock. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Gridlock Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricGridlockWarofraces
Total sessions117,637
Unique hosts2258
Avg players/lobby2.54.6
Avg lobby open time4.3 min4 min
Sessions (30d)01,599
Tracked versions237
Last hostedMay 22, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
0
4,233
Jul 26
0
2,385

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Gridlock and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,637 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 11 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Gridlock (2.5).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 4.3 min for Gridlock. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,599 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Gridlock has been hosted by 2 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.