WC3 TrackerMapsHell L vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Hell L vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 4,717 recorded sessions versus 2. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.4 vs 2), suggesting larger games. Hell L lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.1 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Hell L Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricHell LWarofraces
Total sessions24,717
Unique hosts2244
Avg players/lobby24.4
Avg lobby open time1.1 min 4 min
Sessions (30d)21,643
Tracked versions123
Last hostedJun 13, 2026Jun 13, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
2
1,923

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Hell L and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 4,717 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 2 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.4) than Hell L (2).
Hell L lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.1 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,643 vs 2). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Hell L has been hosted by 2 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 244. Warofraces has the wider host base.