WC3 TrackerMapsHell Of Ruin vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Hell Of Ruin vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,642 recorded sessions versus 65. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 2.7), suggesting larger games. Hell Of Ruin lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.4 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Hell Of Ruin Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricHell Of RuinWarofraces
Total sessions657,642
Unique hosts26258
Avg players/lobby2.74.6
Avg lobby open time1.4 min 4 min
Sessions (30d)11,655
Tracked versions637
Last hostedJul 5, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
5
1,531
Jun 26
65
4,233
Jul 26
1
2,478

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Hell Of Ruin and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,642 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 65 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Hell Of Ruin (2.7).
Hell Of Ruin lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.4 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,655 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Hell Of Ruin has been hosted by 26 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.