WC3 TrackerMapsHungry Hungry Felhounds vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Hungry Hungry Felhounds vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 21. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 2.3), suggesting larger games. Hungry Hungry Felhounds lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.4 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Hungry Hungry Felhounds Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricHungry Hungry FelhoundsWarofraces
Total sessions217,636
Unique hosts4258
Avg players/lobby2.34.6
Avg lobby open time1.4 min 4 min
Sessions (30d)01,574
Tracked versions837
Last hostedJun 19, 2026Jul 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
4
1,531
Jun 26
12
4,233
Jul 26
0
2,226

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Hungry Hungry Felhounds and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 21 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Hungry Hungry Felhounds (2.3).
Hungry Hungry Felhounds lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.4 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,574 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Hungry Hungry Felhounds has been hosted by 4 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.