WC3 TrackerMapsInfection Attack vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Infection Attack vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,494 recorded sessions versus 78. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 2.2), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 3.9 min on average versus 5.3 min for Infection Attack. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Infection Attack Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricInfection AttackWarofraces
Total sessions787,494
Unique hosts7258
Avg players/lobby2.24.6
Avg lobby open time5.3 min3.9 min
Sessions (30d)31,629
Tracked versions1136
Last hostedJul 2, 2026Jul 6, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
23
1,531
Jun 26
53
4,233
Jul 26
1
1,223

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Infection Attack and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,494 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 78 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Infection Attack (2.2).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 3.9 min on average versus 5.3 min for Infection Attack. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,629 vs 3). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Infection Attack has been hosted by 7 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.