WC3 TrackerMapsJpark Survival Z vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Jpark Survival Z vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 4,757 recorded sessions versus 1. Jpark Survival Z averages more players per lobby (5 vs 4.4), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 7 min for Jpark Survival Z. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Jpark Survival Z Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricJpark Survival ZWarofraces
Total sessions14,757
Unique hosts1244
Avg players/lobby5 4.4
Avg lobby open time7 min4 min
Sessions (30d)11,598
Tracked versions123
Last hostedJun 16, 2026Jun 18, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
1
1,963

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Jpark Survival Z and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 4,757 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 1 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Jpark Survival Z has more players per lobby on average (5) than Warofraces (4.4).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 7 min for Jpark Survival Z. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,598 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Jpark Survival Z has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 244. Warofraces has the wider host base.