WC3 TrackerMapsMario Maul vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Mario Maul vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 4. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1.3), suggesting larger games. Mario Maul lobbies fill faster, sitting open 2.1 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Mario Maul Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricMario MaulWarofraces
Total sessions47,636
Unique hosts2258
Avg players/lobby1.34.6
Avg lobby open time2.1 min 4 min
Sessions (30d)01,555
Tracked versions237
Last hostedJun 14, 2026Jul 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
4
4,233
Jul 26
0
2,256

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Mario Maul and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 4 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Mario Maul (1.3).
Mario Maul lobbies fill faster, sitting open 2.1 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,555 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Mario Maul has been hosted by 2 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.