WC3 TrackerMapsMiddle Earth Risk vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Middle Earth Risk vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 7. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1.7), suggesting larger games. Middle Earth Risk lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.5 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Middle Earth Risk Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricMiddle Earth RiskWarofraces
Total sessions77,636
Unique hosts2258
Avg players/lobby1.74.6
Avg lobby open time1.5 min 4 min
Sessions (30d)11,588
Tracked versions337
Last hostedJul 5, 2026Jul 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
1
1,531
Jun 26
2
4,233
Jul 26
1
2,252

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Middle Earth Risk and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 7 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Middle Earth Risk (1.7).
Middle Earth Risk lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.5 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,588 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Middle Earth Risk has been hosted by 2 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.