Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 2. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1), suggesting larger games. Mineralz 1.55(E) For lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.6 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.
Comparing Mineralz 1.55(E) For and Warofraces on Warcraft 3
Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 2 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Mineralz 1.55(E) For (1).
Mineralz 1.55(E) For lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.6 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,555 vs 2). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Mineralz 1.55(E) For has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.