Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,491 recorded sessions versus 131. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 2), suggesting larger games. Mineralz 1.55(F)P lobbies fill faster, sitting open 2.2 min on average versus 3.9 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.
Comparing Mineralz 1.55(F)P and Warofraces on Warcraft 3
Warofraces is more popular, with 7,491 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 131 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Mineralz 1.55(F)P (2).
Mineralz 1.55(F)P lobbies fill faster, sitting open 2.2 min on average versus 3.9 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,608 vs 85). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Mineralz 1.55(F)P has been hosted by 16 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.