WC3 TrackerMapsMoon Survival vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Moon Survival vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,483 recorded sessions versus 5. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1.8), suggesting larger games. Moon Survival lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.4 min on average versus 3.9 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Moon Survival Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricMoon SurvivalWarofraces
Total sessions57,483
Unique hosts1258
Avg players/lobby1.84.6
Avg lobby open time0.4 min 3.9 min
Sessions (30d)51,671
Tracked versions135
Last hostedJul 2, 2026Jul 5, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
0
4,233
Jul 26
5
1,171

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Moon Survival and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,483 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 5 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Moon Survival (1.8).
Moon Survival lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.4 min on average versus 3.9 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,671 vs 5). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Moon Survival has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.