WC3 Tracker›Maps›Mythology Maul Gold (Tft) Copy vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Mythology Maul Gold (Tft) Copy vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,492 recorded sessions versus 3. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1), suggesting larger games. Mythology Maul Gold (Tft) Copy lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.2 min on average versus 3.9 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Mythology Maul Gold (Tft) Copy Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricMythology Maul Gold (Tft) CopyWarofraces
Total sessions37,492 ▲
Unique hosts1258 ▲
Avg players/lobby14.6 ▲
Avg lobby open time1.2 min ▲3.9 min
Sessions (30d)31,622 ▲
Tracked versions136
Last hostedJun 30, 2026Jul 6, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
3
4,233
Jul 26
0
1,215
Explore Each Map
Mythology Maul Gold (Tft) Copy full stats → Warofraces full stats → Watch live Mythology Maul Gold (Tft) Copy lobbies Watch live Warofraces lobbies All map rankings →

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Mythology Maul Gold (Tft) Copy and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,492 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 3 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Mythology Maul Gold (Tft) Copy (1).
Mythology Maul Gold (Tft) Copy lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.2 min on average versus 3.9 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,622 vs 3). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Mythology Maul Gold (Tft) Copy has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.