WC3 TrackerMapsM.Z.I Amberwood vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

M.Z.I Amberwood vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 19. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 4.4), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 20.3 min for M.Z.I Amberwood. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

M.Z.I Amberwood Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricM.Z.I AmberwoodWarofraces
Total sessions197,636
Unique hosts4258
Avg players/lobby4.44.6
Avg lobby open time20.3 min4 min
Sessions (30d)11,576
Tracked versions437
Last hostedJul 7, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
11
1,531
Jun 26
13
4,233
Jul 26
1
2,338

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing M.Z.I Amberwood and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 19 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than M.Z.I Amberwood (4.4).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 20.3 min for M.Z.I Amberwood. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,576 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
M.Z.I Amberwood has been hosted by 4 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.