WC3 TrackerMapsM.Z.I Cityscape vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

M.Z.I Cityscape vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,480 recorded sessions versus 52. M.Z.I Cityscape averages more players per lobby (7.2 vs 4.6), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 3.9 min on average versus 30.8 min for M.Z.I Cityscape. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

M.Z.I Cityscape Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricM.Z.I CityscapeWarofraces
Total sessions527,480
Unique hosts6258
Avg players/lobby7.2 4.6
Avg lobby open time30.8 min3.9 min
Sessions (30d)21,662
Tracked versions435
Last hostedJul 1, 2026Jul 5, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
11
1,531
Jun 26
11
4,233
Jul 26
2
1,158

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing M.Z.I Cityscape and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,480 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 52 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
M.Z.I Cityscape has more players per lobby on average (7.2) than Warofraces (4.6).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 3.9 min on average versus 30.8 min for M.Z.I Cityscape. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,662 vs 2). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
M.Z.I Cityscape has been hosted by 6 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.