WC3 TrackerMapsNhm V.1.2 Beta Test vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Nhm V.1.2 Beta Test vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 4,691 recorded sessions versus 3. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.4 vs 4), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 5.1 min for Nhm V.1.2 Beta Test. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Nhm V.1.2 Beta Test Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricNhm V.1.2 Beta TestWarofraces
Total sessions34,691
Unique hosts1244
Avg players/lobby44.4
Avg lobby open time5.1 min4 min
Sessions (30d)31,697
Tracked versions123
Last hostedJun 10, 2026Jun 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
3
1,890

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Nhm V.1.2 Beta Test and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 4,691 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 3 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.4) than Nhm V.1.2 Beta Test (4).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 5.1 min for Nhm V.1.2 Beta Test. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,697 vs 3). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Nhm V.1.2 Beta Test has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 244. Warofraces has the wider host base.