WC3 TrackerMapsOgremound vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Ogremound vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,555 recorded sessions versus 226. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1.3), suggesting larger games. Ogremound lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.3 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Ogremound Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricOgremoundWarofraces
Total sessions2267,555
Unique hosts113258
Avg players/lobby1.34.6
Avg lobby open time1.3 min 4 min
Sessions (30d)1001,636
Tracked versions136
Last hostedJul 7, 2026Jul 7, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
113
1,531
Jun 26
279
4,233
Jul 26
88
1,438

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Ogremound and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,555 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 226 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Ogremound (1.3).
Ogremound lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.3 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,636 vs 100). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Ogremound has been hosted by 113 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.