WC3 TrackerMapsOrdr vs V 2.0(Beta 3)
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Ordr vs V 2.0(Beta 3)

Ordr is the more popular of the two, with 533,081 recorded sessions versus 5. V 2.0(Beta 3) averages more players per lobby (3.6 vs 2.2), suggesting larger games. Ordr lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.1 min on average versus 1.2 min for V 2.0(Beta 3). Over the past 30 days, Ordr has seen more activity.

Ordr V 2.0(Beta 3)
Head to Head
MetricOrdrV 2.0(Beta 3)
Total sessions533,081 5
Unique hosts20,142 1
Avg players/lobby2.23.6
Avg lobby open time1.1 min 1.2 min
Sessions (30d)164,044 0
Tracked versions2291
Last hostedJul 11, 2026Jun 25, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
95,646
0
Jun 26
403,714
5
Jul 26
233,717
0

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Ordr and V 2.0(Beta 3) on Warcraft 3

Ordr is more popular, with 533,081 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 5 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
V 2.0(Beta 3) has more players per lobby on average (3.6) than Ordr (2.2).
Ordr lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.1 min on average versus 1.2 min for V 2.0(Beta 3). A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Ordr has had more sessions in the last 30 days (164,044 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Ordr has been hosted by 20,142 unique BattleTags and V 2.0(Beta 3) by 1. Ordr has the wider host base.