WC3 TrackerMapsPokemaul Sapphirer6.0 vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Pokemaul Sapphirer6.0 vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 13. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1.5), suggesting larger games. Pokemaul Sapphirer6.0 lobbies fill faster, sitting open 3.3 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Pokemaul Sapphirer6.0 Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricPokemaul Sapphirer6.0Warofraces
Total sessions137,636
Unique hosts1258
Avg players/lobby1.54.6
Avg lobby open time3.3 min 4 min
Sessions (30d)11,558
Tracked versions137
Last hostedJul 6, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
13
4,233
Jul 26
3
2,312

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Pokemaul Sapphirer6.0 and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 13 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Pokemaul Sapphirer6.0 (1.5).
Pokemaul Sapphirer6.0 lobbies fill faster, sitting open 3.3 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,558 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Pokemaul Sapphirer6.0 has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.