WC3 TrackerMapsPokemaul vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Pokemaul vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,492 recorded sessions versus 3. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1), suggesting larger games. Pokemaul lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.6 min on average versus 3.9 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Pokemaul Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricPokemaulWarofraces
Total sessions37,492
Unique hosts2258
Avg players/lobby14.6
Avg lobby open time0.6 min 3.9 min
Sessions (30d)21,623
Tracked versions136
Last hostedJul 2, 2026Jul 6, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
1
1,531
Jun 26
1
4,233
Jul 26
2
1,215

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Pokemaul and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,492 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 3 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Pokemaul (1).
Pokemaul lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.6 min on average versus 3.9 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,623 vs 2). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Pokemaul has been hosted by 2 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.