WC3 TrackerMapsPokemonteamtd 2.0(P) vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Pokemonteamtd 2.0(P) vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 5,170 recorded sessions versus 4. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.4 vs 2.8), suggesting larger games. Pokemonteamtd 2.0(P) lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.9 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Pokemonteamtd 2.0(P) Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricPokemonteamtd 2.0(P)Warofraces
Total sessions45,170
Unique hosts3258
Avg players/lobby2.84.4
Avg lobby open time1.9 min 4 min
Sessions (30d)41,765
Tracked versions229
Last hostedJun 20, 2026Jun 24, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
2
1,531
Jun 26
4
2,716

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Pokemonteamtd 2.0(P) and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 5,170 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 4 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.4) than Pokemonteamtd 2.0(P) (2.8).
Pokemonteamtd 2.0(P) lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.9 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,765 vs 4). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Pokemonteamtd 2.0(P) has been hosted by 3 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.