WC3 TrackerMapsRisk Ffa vs Zombie Defense
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Risk Ffa vs Zombie Defense

Zombie Defense is the more popular of the two, with 4,878 recorded sessions versus 1. Zombie Defense averages more players per lobby (2.7 vs 1), suggesting larger games. Risk Ffa lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.2 min on average versus 2.4 min for Zombie Defense. Over the past 30 days, Zombie Defense has seen more activity.

Risk Ffa Zombie Defense
Head to Head
MetricRisk FfaZombie Defense
Total sessions14,878
Unique hosts1281
Avg players/lobby12.7
Avg lobby open time0.2 min 2.4 min
Sessions (30d)12,221
Tracked versions127
Last hostedJun 12, 2026Jun 12, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
0
2,307
Jun 26
1
2,342

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Risk Ffa and Zombie Defense on Warcraft 3

Zombie Defense is more popular, with 4,878 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 1 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Zombie Defense has more players per lobby on average (2.7) than Risk Ffa (1).
Risk Ffa lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.2 min on average versus 2.4 min for Zombie Defense. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Zombie Defense has had more sessions in the last 30 days (2,221 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Risk Ffa has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Zombie Defense by 281. Zombie Defense has the wider host base.