WC3 TrackerMapsRisk Next Gen vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Risk Next Gen vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,491 recorded sessions versus 3. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 3.9 min on average versus 14 min for Risk Next Gen. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Risk Next Gen Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricRisk Next GenWarofraces
Total sessions37,491
Unique hosts1258
Avg players/lobby14.6
Avg lobby open time14 min3.9 min
Sessions (30d)31,615
Tracked versions136
Last hostedJul 3, 2026Jul 6, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
0
4,233
Jul 26
3
1,195

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Risk Next Gen and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,491 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 3 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Risk Next Gen (1).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 3.9 min on average versus 14 min for Risk Next Gen. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,615 vs 3). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Risk Next Gen has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.