WC3 TrackerMapsRiver Of Blood vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

River Of Blood vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,637 recorded sessions versus 2. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1.5), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 8.8 min for River Of Blood. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

River Of Blood Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricRiver Of BloodWarofraces
Total sessions27,637
Unique hosts1258
Avg players/lobby1.54.6
Avg lobby open time8.8 min4 min
Sessions (30d)11,581
Tracked versions237
Last hostedJul 10, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
1
1,531
Jun 26
1
4,233
Jul 26
1
2,367

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing River Of Blood and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,637 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 2 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than River Of Blood (1.5).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 8.8 min for River Of Blood. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,581 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
River Of Blood has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.