WC3 Tracker›Maps›Rough Survival In The Forest vs Towersurvivors
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Rough Survival In The Forest vs Towersurvivors

Towersurvivors is the more popular of the two, with 15,971 recorded sessions versus 11. Towersurvivors averages more players per lobby (4.4 vs 2.6), suggesting larger games. Rough Survival In The Forest lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.8 min on average versus 1.4 min for Towersurvivors. Over the past 30 days, Towersurvivors has seen more activity.

Rough Survival In The Forest Towersurvivors
Head to Head
MetricRough Survival In The ForestTowersurvivors
Total sessions1115,971 ▲
Unique hosts31,229 ▲
Avg players/lobby2.64.4 ▲
Avg lobby open time0.8 min ▲1.4 min
Sessions (30d)118,178 ▲
Tracked versions175
Last hostedJul 5, 2026Jul 5, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
7,617
Jun 26
0
22,099
Jul 26
11
5,677
Explore Each Map
Rough Survival In The Forest full stats → Towersurvivors full stats → Watch live Rough Survival In The Forest lobbies Watch live Towersurvivors lobbies All map rankings →

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Rough Survival In The Forest and Towersurvivors on Warcraft 3

Towersurvivors is more popular, with 15,971 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 11 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Towersurvivors has more players per lobby on average (4.4) than Rough Survival In The Forest (2.6).
Rough Survival In The Forest lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.8 min on average versus 1.4 min for Towersurvivors. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Towersurvivors has had more sessions in the last 30 days (8,178 vs 11). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Rough Survival In The Forest has been hosted by 3 unique BattleTags and Towersurvivors by 1,229. Towersurvivors has the wider host base.