WC3 TrackerMapsRu Tcom 18.14e(Demon Remad) vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Ru Tcom 18.14e(Demon Remad) vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,494 recorded sessions versus 1. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1), suggesting larger games. Ru Tcom 18.14e(Demon Remad) lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.2 min on average versus 3.9 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Ru Tcom 18.14e(Demon Remad) Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricRu Tcom 18.14e(Demon Remad)Warofraces
Total sessions17,494
Unique hosts1258
Avg players/lobby14.6
Avg lobby open time0.2 min 3.9 min
Sessions (30d)11,634
Tracked versions136
Last hostedJul 4, 2026Jul 6, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
0
4,233
Jul 26
1
1,223

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Ru Tcom 18.14e(Demon Remad) and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,494 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 1 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Ru Tcom 18.14e(Demon Remad) (1).
Ru Tcom 18.14e(Demon Remad) lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.2 min on average versus 3.9 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,634 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Ru Tcom 18.14e(Demon Remad) has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.