WC3 TrackerMapsRun Kitty Run Remastered vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Run Kitty Run Remastered vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,557 recorded sessions versus 4. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 2), suggesting larger games. Run Kitty Run Remastered lobbies fill faster, sitting open 3.1 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Run Kitty Run Remastered Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricRun Kitty Run RemasteredWarofraces
Total sessions47,557
Unique hosts1258
Avg players/lobby24.6
Avg lobby open time3.1 min 4 min
Sessions (30d)11,660
Tracked versions136
Last hostedJul 4, 2026Jul 7, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
2
1,531
Jun 26
0
4,233
Jul 26
1
1,459

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Run Kitty Run Remastered and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,557 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 4 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Run Kitty Run Remastered (2).
Run Kitty Run Remastered lobbies fill faster, sitting open 3.1 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,660 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Run Kitty Run Remastered has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.