Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 4,697 recorded sessions versus 4. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.4 vs 2), suggesting larger games. Solo Micromaul lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.9 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.
Comparing Solo Micromaul and Warofraces on Warcraft 3
Warofraces is more popular, with 4,697 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 4 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.4) than Solo Micromaul (2).
Solo Micromaul lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.9 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,659 vs 4). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Solo Micromaul has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 244. Warofraces has the wider host base.