WC3 TrackerMapsStar Wars Maul vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Star Wars Maul vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 24. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 4.1), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 4.3 min for Star Wars Maul. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Star Wars Maul Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricStar Wars MaulWarofraces
Total sessions247,636
Unique hosts6258
Avg players/lobby4.14.6
Avg lobby open time4.3 min4 min
Sessions (30d)131,555
Tracked versions537
Last hostedJul 8, 2026Jul 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
5
1,531
Jun 26
4
4,233
Jul 26
17
2,256

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Star Wars Maul and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 24 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Star Wars Maul (4.1).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 4.3 min for Star Wars Maul. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,555 vs 13). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Star Wars Maul has been hosted by 6 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.