WC3 TrackerMapsStarwars Maul vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Starwars Maul vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 11. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 3.7), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 5.6 min for Starwars Maul. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Starwars Maul Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricStarwars MaulWarofraces
Total sessions117,636
Unique hosts2258
Avg players/lobby3.74.6
Avg lobby open time5.6 min4 min
Sessions (30d)31,573
Tracked versions337
Last hostedJul 9, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
8
4,233
Jul 26
3
2,329

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Starwars Maul and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 11 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Starwars Maul (3.7).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 5.6 min for Starwars Maul. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,573 vs 3). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Starwars Maul has been hosted by 2 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.