WC3 TrackerMapsSurvival With Zombies vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Survival With Zombies vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 4,697 recorded sessions versus 4. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.4 vs 2.5), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 4.5 min for Survival With Zombies. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Survival With Zombies Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricSurvival With ZombiesWarofraces
Total sessions44,697
Unique hosts1244
Avg players/lobby2.54.4
Avg lobby open time4.5 min4 min
Sessions (30d)41,615
Tracked versions123
Last hostedJun 11, 2026Jun 12, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
4
1,903

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Survival With Zombies and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 4,697 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 4 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.4) than Survival With Zombies (2.5).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 4.5 min for Survival With Zombies. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,615 vs 4). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Survival With Zombies has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 244. Warofraces has the wider host base.