WC3 TrackerMapsTesttestteststarwars Blood vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Testtestteststarwars Blood vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 19. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 2.1), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 6.1 min for Testtestteststarwars Blood. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Testtestteststarwars Blood Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricTesttestteststarwars BloodWarofraces
Total sessions197,636
Unique hosts5258
Avg players/lobby2.14.6
Avg lobby open time6.1 min4 min
Sessions (30d)31,555
Tracked versions1137
Last hostedJul 5, 2026Jul 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
3
1,531
Jun 26
14
4,233
Jul 26
8
2,256

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Testtestteststarwars Blood and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 19 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Testtestteststarwars Blood (2.1).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 6.1 min for Testtestteststarwars Blood. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,555 vs 3). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Testtestteststarwars Blood has been hosted by 5 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.