WC3 TrackerMapsTundra vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Tundra vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 4,736 recorded sessions versus 1. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.4 vs 2), suggesting larger games. Tundra lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.8 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Tundra Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricTundraWarofraces
Total sessions14,736
Unique hosts1244
Avg players/lobby24.4
Avg lobby open time0.8 min 4 min
Sessions (30d)11,610
Tracked versions123
Last hostedJun 14, 2026Jun 14, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
1
1,942

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Tundra and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 4,736 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 1 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.4) than Tundra (2).
Tundra lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.8 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,610 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Tundra has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 244. Warofraces has the wider host base.