WC3 TrackerMapsUndead Coming(Ionutep Translate) vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Undead Coming(Ionutep Translate) vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,647 recorded sessions versus 636. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 3.7), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 5.9 min for Undead Coming(Ionutep Translate). Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Undead Coming(Ionutep Translate) Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricUndead Coming(Ionutep Translate)Warofraces
Total sessions6367,647
Unique hosts40258
Avg players/lobby3.74.6
Avg lobby open time5.9 min4 min
Sessions (30d)01,709
Tracked versions237
Last hostedJul 4, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
392
1,531
Jun 26
578
4,233
Jul 26
7
2,539

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Undead Coming(Ionutep Translate) and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,647 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 636 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Undead Coming(Ionutep Translate) (3.7).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 5.9 min for Undead Coming(Ionutep Translate). A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,709 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Undead Coming(Ionutep Translate) has been hosted by 40 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.