WC3 TrackerMapsVampirismfire vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Vampirismfire vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,494 recorded sessions versus 469. Vampirismfire averages more players per lobby (5.9 vs 4.6), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 3.9 min on average versus 14.1 min for Vampirismfire. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Vampirismfire Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricVampirismfireWarofraces
Total sessions4697,494
Unique hosts41258
Avg players/lobby5.9 4.6
Avg lobby open time14.1 min3.9 min
Sessions (30d)1301,629
Tracked versions2836
Last hostedJul 5, 2026Jul 6, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
99
1,531
Jun 26
501
4,233
Jul 26
88
1,223

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Vampirismfire and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,494 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 469 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Vampirismfire has more players per lobby on average (5.9) than Warofraces (4.6).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 3.9 min on average versus 14.1 min for Vampirismfire. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,629 vs 130). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Vampirismfire has been hosted by 41 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.