WC3 TrackerMapsVirus Infection vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Virus Infection vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 4,741 recorded sessions versus 5. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.4 vs 2.4), suggesting larger games. Virus Infection lobbies fill faster, sitting open 3.8 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Virus Infection Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricVirus InfectionWarofraces
Total sessions54,741
Unique hosts2244
Avg players/lobby2.44.4
Avg lobby open time3.8 min 4 min
Sessions (30d)41,603
Tracked versions223
Last hostedJun 14, 2026Jun 15, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
2
1,531
Jun 26
4
1,947

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Virus Infection and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 4,741 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 5 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.4) than Virus Infection (2.4).
Virus Infection lobbies fill faster, sitting open 3.8 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,603 vs 4). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Virus Infection has been hosted by 2 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 244. Warofraces has the wider host base.