WC3 TrackerMapsWarcraft Maul Nextgen vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Warcraft Maul Nextgen vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 14. Warcraft Maul Nextgen averages more players per lobby (5.4 vs 4.6), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 6.1 min for Warcraft Maul Nextgen. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Warcraft Maul Nextgen Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricWarcraft Maul NextgenWarofraces
Total sessions147,636
Unique hosts3258
Avg players/lobby5.4 4.6
Avg lobby open time6.1 min4 min
Sessions (30d)01,557
Tracked versions237
Last hostedJun 26, 2026Jul 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
13
1,531
Jun 26
5
4,233
Jul 26
0
2,256

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Warcraft Maul Nextgen and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 14 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warcraft Maul Nextgen has more players per lobby on average (5.4) than Warofraces (4.6).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 6.1 min for Warcraft Maul Nextgen. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,557 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Warcraft Maul Nextgen has been hosted by 3 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.