WC3 TrackerMapsWarcraft Maul X30c vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Warcraft Maul X30c vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 3. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 4), suggesting larger games. Warcraft Maul X30c lobbies fill faster, sitting open 3.5 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Warcraft Maul X30c Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricWarcraft Maul X30cWarofraces
Total sessions37,636
Unique hosts3258
Avg players/lobby44.6
Avg lobby open time3.5 min 4 min
Sessions (30d)21,576
Tracked versions137
Last hostedJul 6, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
3
1,531
Jun 26
0
4,233
Jul 26
3
2,342

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Warcraft Maul X30c and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 3 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Warcraft Maul X30c (4).
Warcraft Maul X30c lobbies fill faster, sitting open 3.5 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,576 vs 2). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Warcraft Maul X30c has been hosted by 3 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.