WC3 TrackerMapsWarofraces vs Wcmaul
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Warofraces vs Wcmaul

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 33. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 3.7), suggesting larger games. Wcmaul lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.9 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Warofraces Wcmaul
Head to Head
MetricWarofracesWcmaul
Total sessions7,636 33
Unique hosts258 2
Avg players/lobby4.6 3.7
Avg lobby open time4 min1.9 min
Sessions (30d)1,554 0
Tracked versions371
Last hostedJul 10, 2026Jun 8, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
1,531
26
Jun 26
4,233
13
Jul 26
2,256
0

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Warofraces and Wcmaul on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 33 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Wcmaul (3.7).
Wcmaul lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.9 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,554 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Warofraces has been hosted by 258 unique BattleTags and Wcmaul by 2. Warofraces has the wider host base.