WC3 TrackerMapsWarofraces vs Wintermaul
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Warofraces vs Wintermaul

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,494 recorded sessions versus 67. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 2.2), suggesting larger games. Wintermaul lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.5 min on average versus 3.9 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Warofraces Wintermaul
Head to Head
MetricWarofracesWintermaul
Total sessions7,494 67
Unique hosts258 8
Avg players/lobby4.6 2.2
Avg lobby open time3.9 min1.5 min
Sessions (30d)1,629 1
Tracked versions367
Last hostedJul 6, 2026Jul 3, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
1,531
2
Jun 26
4,233
64
Jul 26
1,223
1

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Warofraces and Wintermaul on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,494 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 67 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Wintermaul (2.2).
Wintermaul lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.5 min on average versus 3.9 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,629 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Warofraces has been hosted by 258 unique BattleTags and Wintermaul by 8. Warofraces has the wider host base.