WC3 TrackerMapsWarofraces vs Zombie Attack (V 2.8)
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Warofraces vs Zombie Attack (V 2.8)

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,496 recorded sessions versus 81. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1.5), suggesting larger games. Zombie Attack (V 2.8) lobbies fill faster, sitting open 2.2 min on average versus 3.9 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Warofraces Zombie Attack (V 2.8)
Head to Head
MetricWarofracesZombie Attack (V 2.8)
Total sessions7,496 81
Unique hosts258 10
Avg players/lobby4.6 1.5
Avg lobby open time3.9 min2.2 min
Sessions (30d)1,640 18
Tracked versions363
Last hostedJul 6, 2026Jul 5, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
1,531
18
Jun 26
4,233
32
Jul 26
1,234
9

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Warofraces and Zombie Attack (V 2.8) on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,496 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 81 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Zombie Attack (V 2.8) (1.5).
Zombie Attack (V 2.8) lobbies fill faster, sitting open 2.2 min on average versus 3.9 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,640 vs 18). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Warofraces has been hosted by 258 unique BattleTags and Zombie Attack (V 2.8) by 10. Warofraces has the wider host base.