WC3 TrackerMapsWarofraces vs Zombie Marsh
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Warofraces vs Zombie Marsh

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 5. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 2.2), suggesting larger games. Zombie Marsh lobbies fill faster, sitting open 3.7 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Warofraces Zombie Marsh
Head to Head
MetricWarofracesZombie Marsh
Total sessions7,636 5
Unique hosts258 1
Avg players/lobby4.6 2.2
Avg lobby open time4 min3.7 min
Sessions (30d)1,557 0
Tracked versions371
Last hostedJul 11, 2026Jun 3, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
1,531
1
Jun 26
4,233
4
Jul 26
2,294
0

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Warofraces and Zombie Marsh on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 5 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Zombie Marsh (2.2).
Zombie Marsh lobbies fill faster, sitting open 3.7 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,557 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Warofraces has been hosted by 258 unique BattleTags and Zombie Marsh by 1. Warofraces has the wider host base.